@tedvid: @LisaSabinWilson yes! It's the new trend... Post-food/drink pics! http://twitpic.com/29to40

Archive for movie

A movie in 8 frames – “The Quiet Man”

Monday, April 19th, 2010

I had to do a project for my lighting and cinematography class, the task was to watch a film from before 1970 from the perspective of solely a cinematographer and write a paper over it. So I went to Blockbuster (I know I know.. lame) and searched for something worthwhile. I came across the John Ford directed The Quiet Man and settled on it because I’m a fan of John Wayne and I had seen segments of the movie before on television.

Anyway, I circumvented my OS’s feeble attempt to keep me from screen capturing with the DVD player open and got 8 frames that I think really sum up the move nicely. (Click here for the movie synopsis)

The first frame is John Wayne’s character Sean Thornton and Barry Fitzgerald’s character Michaleen Oge Flynn. The frame sums up both of their on screen persona’s nicely.

The second depicts the beginning of the rivalry between Thornton and Danaher who is Mary Kate’s (The lead actress and Wayne’s crush in the movie played by Maureen O’Hara) brother.

The third is of Mary Kate (Will your 1950s self please marry me?).

The fourth and fifth sums up Sean and Mary Kate’s relationship quite nicely. One second it’s great and passionate, the next it’s gone and confusing.

The sixth sums up Sean Thornton’s masculinity – he’s just struck his match on the crossbeam above his head in this frame and he is about to put Mary Kate in her place. This was my favorite scene in the movie.

The last two are of the gigantic boxing scene at the end which alone makes the movie worth watching.

Hope you enjoyed this! Let me know if I should do more “movies in 8 frames” (I’ll probably go into more detail in the future as well)

- Ted

Categories : Videography, film, movie
Comments (0)

Akira Kurosawa Film Cinematography

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

Akira Kurosawa is a Japanese filmmaker who directed films in the 40s, 50s and 60s. The clips from above are from one of his more famous films, Rashomon. Kurosawa basically puts on a school for shot composition and texture throughout every scene I have watched of his so far. I love the way he uses the camera narratively and the overall look of his movies. His movie Seven Samurai is incredibly long, but definitely worth the watch if you are ever feeling like a black and white movie night.

As a random tidbit: George Lucas was influenced by Kurosawa. Something about Samurai swordsmen perhaps?

- Ted

Categories : Videography, film, movie, review
Comments (0)

Sounds are Important

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

No. Don’t read this yet. Watch the video above first.

Alright now that you’ve gotten that out of the way:

I mentioned on Twitter the other day that I’ve noticed a recent trend in video/film in the emphasis of ordinary sounds – taking normal, minute sounds and making them the most audible parts of the clip.  Now I may be wrong, but I honestly think this is partly due to the way we currently like to participate in media. We expect response when we engage and so when we see visuals of earthy things, we expect an overly earthy response (such as the beginning of the video above) and we are able to attain this if the sound matches the engagement.

The film I noticed it in most recently was Shutter Island, which I saw over the weekend. Martin Scorsese used a very intricate interaction between imagery and sound in the direction of this film. Robert Richardson also did an absolutely incredible job with the cinematography as his images made the emphasized sound relative.

Anyway, I’m interested in trying this in the next short I make. What I’m going to make – don’t ask me yet.

Categories : Videography, film, movie, video
Comments (2)

Charlie Chaplin

Friday, February 5th, 2010

I’m currently enrolled in a History of Motion Pictures class that I’m thoroughly enjoying, although I am beginning to reach my limit of old silent films. However, one man’s films have stuck out to me just as his have to most everyone who has seen the gold that Charles Chaplin produced back in his day.

As I’ve watched clip after clip of his comedy remaining relevant to this day, and after being frequently amazed by his ability to set up comedy, I’ve begun to really appreciate what Chaplin contributed to film development. I’ve also begun to appreciate the liberties he took within the creative process. He was producing movies in a time when people were still acclimating to shot sequences with multiple edits rather than just one shot takes, but managed to create complex humor based off of complex editing that controls what the audience is viewing and understanding. It’s incredible to me that his ingenuity and creative ability propelled him into his now American icon status (even though he is British). Charlie Chaplin new that moving pictures moved people.

Maybe not quite on the same scale as Chaplin (haha), but hopefully I can do the same at one point or another.

Here is a Desktop Wallpaper that I created, feel free to download it if you would like: click here to download (1680×1050)

Categories : Videography, movie, review, video
Comments (0)

“The book was better than the movie”

Sunday, January 10th, 2010

“The book was better than the movie.”

How many times have you said or heard someone else say this? Personally, I have heard this so many times that it makes me sick. Before you go novel-elitist on me, let me explain.

Books are not better than movies. Books are different than movies.

When reading/viewing:

Books are more engrossing. The take more time, they take more energy, and they take more imagination.

Movies are less engrossing. They take less time, they take less energy, and they take less imagination.

Now some of you are saying, “exactly, books are better than movies” and are missing the point: you can’t compare them. You have to compare movies with other movies and books with other books (there is a well known cliché that I could easily throw in here, but I prefer bananas and pineapples). You cannot be upset when your favorite 400 page book does not fit perfectly in a two hour movie, and then be upset when Peter Jackson’s latest adaptation is “too long.” There are so many ironies in that previous sentence that it might make your head explode.

Look, I love books, and like most of the world I wish I read more. However, I also love movies, and I love movies adapted from my favorite books. I just recognize that they are different mediums of entertainment, not to be confused as the same. I judge the movie on its own merit, and the book the same way.

When you say that the book is better than the movie, you are saying that your own idea of something is better than someone else’s. Now, there is a shock.

Next time, when you go to ramble about the movie not living up to the book, please, think again.

Categories : Advice, movie
Comments (0)

Avatar – The Dream I Never Had

Friday, December 18th, 2009

Na'viThis “movie review” is coming from someone who has absolutely no authority whatsoever to critique or analyze a movie, I am simply a movie-lover, in college, studying film, who hoped Avatar might be like it was cracked up to be.

People who know I was one of the nerds who waited up until midnight to then watch a 2 hour and 40 minute movie, have pestered me with questions, asking what the movie is like and the best answer I can come up with is as follows:

You know that dream you always wish you could have had when you were a kid? The one where you hit your pillow and find yourself to be 10 feet tall, a different color, you can jump higher and run faster, you can connect with animals and then ride them, then plants interact with you, and you made friends and then got to fight something? – Well maybe that wish was just mine… but that was Avatar.

Before I get any further, I have to suggest to you (yeah you, the person reading this right now) to see it in 3D – the 3D experience in this movie is comparable to the first time you happened to see High Definition TV after years of standard definition.

The 3D takes a solid 15 minutes to let your eyes and brain adjust to it. In real life you get to choose what to focus on in your own 3D environment but in the movie the focus is done for you, so it isn’t until you sort of “give up control” of your eyes’ depth of focus that you begin to feel like you are the camera and you get to fully take in the new world James Cameron created.

The only downside to the movie is the unabashedly political undertone in which Cameron and his team entirely oversimplify the War in Iraq that he obviously criticizes throughout the film. If the circumstances in Iraq were the same as they are in the human’s assault on the Na’vi in Avatar, then even the farthest right wing conservative would be in agreement on who the protagonists are (Jake Sully and the Na’vi) and who antagonists are (us greedy humans). This however does not inhibit the story-line which is good enough to stand alone (without the special effects, I mean) and only further proves Cameron can simply make a good movie.

All in all, I was blown away. I began to halt my anticipation a couple of days prior to the movie’s release just in case it was a huge flop as some had anticipated, but I do not see any glaring signs of a budding box office dud. It’s one of those movies that people will talk about and refer to for quite sometime and you will find yourself the outsider if you have not seen it.

Go see it, and be prepared to suspend reality – a lot.

- Ted

Categories : Videography, movie, review
Comments (2)

Stay Updated

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner